|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
82
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 10:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:Caliph Muhammed wrote: It would solve cloaky camps people complain about. It would give a point to cloaks people complain about.
Uncloak aliegned, tap bomb, warp to safety. No time to get reinforcements on grid to help or even lock targets. Hurray for 100% Safe uncounterable attacks. Then nerf bombs. Change them. Make them super powerful torpedoes that can only hit capitals. It would be a small sacrifice, and im a dedicated cloaky kind of player, for the greater good of the game. But also remember that even if that were the case no local means that for that to occur a scouting operation would have had to of occured first. Maybe it would be a well earned uncounterable attack.
nerf bombs too? why not nerf everyting so that you can actually get some kills since you are so bloody bad at it and you have to relly on wardecking high sec industrialist to win at eve I tell you what needs nerfing, YOU posting in forum  The thread is called Grow some balls, i say to you, Grow a spine! |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
82
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 13:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
the only way to populate 0.0 is to change 0.0 sanctums or something similar. Prior the huge sanctum nerf, there were people everywhere in 0.0. Some idiots said that the sanctums should be nerfed and it wouldnt interfeer with numbers too much. I argued against it, that it would change numbers drastically.
Now look at us. Removing local is gonna do nothing for numbers in 0.0. More than 30% left 0.0 cos of that stupid nerf. And thats an under estimation. I belive the numbers are much higher. The only things thats gonna change it is to boost 0.0 isk bonus which always atracts players in the thousands. Keep nerfing 0.0 and less and less people are gonna want to be there. It simply too much effort and headache for the small and medium entities with almost no reward.
I know if local gets nerfed even less people are gonna be in 0.0 and most just go to highsec and run level 4s. Not to mention all those entities wouldnt have to pay rent. Removing local result will just make 0.0 a dump. |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
82
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 13:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:Pathetic From: ****** To: Caliph Muhammed
INBOX
you are one pathetic son a bi.tch. Sociopath piece of dogturd. Just biomass yourself, make the game a better place.
Cu.nt.
Fanmail =)
you fan mail kinda has a point. With your use of language and how you have refered to others in this thread and in the previous thread. You are one very angry person. Its not surpsiring you got hate mail. I am surprisd you did not get it before speaking how you have been speaking to others. |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
83
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 13:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:I understand completely. If you need to vent feel free. Send me a mail with your feelings and I promise to hold them forever and cherish them, like love letters.
rofl. I am much more smooth than i apear. I dont fall into that trap. All i said, was thats is deserving. Not that i feel the same way  |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
83
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 13:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Karn Dulake wrote:Caliph Muhammed wrote:Pathetic From: ****** To: Caliph Muhammed
INBOX
you are one pathetic son a bi.tch. Sociopath piece of dogturd. Just biomass yourself, make the game a better place.
Cu.nt.
Fanmail =) Reasons why this email only exists in your own imagination. 1. People are arguing with each other they mainly see you as an irritation 2. No one is calling you Sociopathic but yourself.
+1 ROFL i love part 2. I bet somewhere in that brain there is a neuron that is telling him, you are a sociopath! I bet that much is true. |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
83
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 16:45:00 -
[6] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Caliph Muhammed wrote:We havent established anything other than local removes everything listed in the original post and that goonswarm has slipped up and recruited some seriously carebear players. People who only want easy-mode killmails are worse than the carebears.
 +1 |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
83
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 16:50:00 -
[7] - Quote
specializt wrote:Solj RichPopolous wrote:Simple Fix. Remove local and overhaul the scanner into something that resembles radar in an actual spaceship. No local but if I open up my scanner (and yes have it autoscan) ships will appear with the same color tagging system thats already in place for local. This alone adds so much more immersion to EVE imho. This will also overload the servers with scan-requests, making EvE yet again even more of an lagfest.
+1 |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
83
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 16:56:00 -
[8] - Quote
My point remains the same removing local is not gonna increase numbers in 0.0! On the contrary is gonna reduce them. Provide an insentive to make 0.0 really worth (like prior the big sanctum nerf) going for small and medium entities and we are back in business. Keep ignoring the problem and blaming it on YOUR bad skills, the problem will only get worst. |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
83
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 17:04:00 -
[9] - Quote
Miilla wrote:Andrea Roche wrote:My point remains the same removing local is not gonna increase numbers in 0.0! On the contrary is gonna reduce them. Provide an insentive to make 0.0 really worth (like prior the big sanctum nerf) going for small and medium entities and we are back in business. Keep ignoring the problem and blaming it on YOUR bad skills, the problem will only get worst. So, are you saying delayed local is preventing people populating W-space?
i dont know why are you speaking of wh. I will tell you again. You cant compair a wh system to a 0.0 system. With or without local you cant compare them. They are so different. The amount of traffic you get on a gate is much large and you you dont have scan a million signatures. How of then do you hear a wh is lost to an invading force? Now how oftendo you hear someone loses a system? WH is the safest area in eve. |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
83
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 17:14:00 -
[10] - Quote
Miilla wrote:Andrea Roche wrote:Miilla wrote:Andrea Roche wrote:My point remains the same removing local is not gonna increase numbers in 0.0! On the contrary is gonna reduce them. Provide an insentive to make 0.0 really worth (like prior the big sanctum nerf) going for small and medium entities and we are back in business. Keep ignoring the problem and blaming it on YOUR bad skills, the problem will only get worst. So, are you saying delayed local is preventing people populating W-space? i dont know why are you speaking of wh. I will tell you again. You cant compair a wh system to a 0.0 system. With or without local you cant compare them. They are so different. The amount of traffic you get on a gate is much large and you you dont have scan a million signatures. How often do you hear a wh is lost to an invading force? Now how oftendo you hear someone loses a system? WH is the safest area in eve just cos you need to spot it and the opening lasts very little time. You may have heard those crazy ppl that decided to invade some other wormhole. They had to scan and collapse almost 2000 whs. Dont compare whs to 0.0 there is nothing similar nothing So you want nullsec to remain easy mode. Ok. I can understand that.
yeah and suicide ganking is not easy mode right? Not that i care anyways, cos i have been on the receiving end. I hav done them and realise after 60 kills that its too easy and its making me lose interest in eve, so i quit suicide. But just the fact that it is easy mode.
|
|

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
83
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 17:21:00 -
[11] - Quote
Miilla wrote:Andrea Roche wrote:[quote=Miilla]
yeah and suicide ganking is not easy mode right? Not that i care anyways, cos i have been on the receiving end. I hav done them and realise after 60 kills that its too easy and its making me lose interest in eve, so i quit suicide. But just the fact that it is easy mode. What you need? 1 week of training time right? Dont make me speak about easy mode plz. Frantically you should be the last peorspn who should be talking about easymode U MAD? i am smooth. I just felt that you were being a hypocrite. So i thought its nice to rub stuff on a hypocrite  |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
84
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:56:00 -
[12] - Quote
not gonna happen specially with dust 514 coming out. Its too dangerous and prawn to massive unsubscribes. You can bet your butt this this would lead into a brawl. CCP wont even come close to anything that could stur the nest specially with dust being very weak atm. This is wthout mentioning all the issues that was ignored with those changes. You got 0 chance. Infact you got a higher chance of wining the lotto atm than that. |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
86
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 12:43:00 -
[13] - Quote
have a cookie! this thread is just a competition between 5 or so people for who is the worst poster and has the worst ideas. I must say, the competition is very tight  |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
86
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 12:52:00 -
[14] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote: But hey, thanks for going on record, since it shows just how out of touch with nullsec you actually are.
ofcource he is ouf of touch with 0.0. All he does is wardecking corps in high sec and some low sec gate camping. |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
86
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 13:04:00 -
[15] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:Andrea Roche wrote:Lord Zim wrote: But hey, thanks for going on record, since it shows just how out of touch with nullsec you actually are.
ofcource he is ouf of touch with 0.0. All he does is wardecking corps in high sec and some low sec gate camping. And all you do is alt post on a bitchass npc corp alt. Hows my taint smell? Youre in the thread irrelevant as ever sniffing it as much as you can.
you should report the big bady npc alt that touched you. Here have a cookie for your sociopath rage! |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
86
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 13:26:00 -
[16] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:Andrea Roche wrote:garbage Nah no need. I feel great posting under my main expressing myself as I wish. Scurry back under the dumpster cockroach. Lol. Actually cockroche. /Smug Winning!
you must think you are inteligent do you? Too bad your post do not reflect any else but the sociopath in you  WWOOOOOSSSSAAAA |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
86
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 13:35:00 -
[17] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:Andrea Roche wrote:garbage Yeah thats why the OP likes keep going up and you're still bravehearting behind a alt.
poor you. my heart is almost bleeding for you  |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
87
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 13:55:00 -
[18] - Quote
Zosius wrote:I support idea that local should not register people via wormholes or atleast get delayed. Now every time you jump in, all farmers park before you move fromsession cloak. Should same mechanics apply for cov ops cyno. This would add so much fun and null with low would actually have risk involved.
that depends on what you mean with "covert ops cyno". I guess you dont mean a regular cyno in a covert ops ship? If you get black ops also involved it could get very messy. One of the reasons why CCP has not changed in many years black ops is cos they are "OP". If you bring them into the game, it could add more serious issues to an already "OP" ships...I ould say this needs to have to be looked really deeply. |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
87
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 14:00:00 -
[19] - Quote
specializt wrote:after reading this thread, i know support the idea of closing down WHs permanently, moving the players to crowded nullsec-places and dropping the T3-loot in 10/10 with a much lower droprate from now on. It would be marvelous ...
rofl. if there is one thing we already have prooved that in eve, you cant force people to do anything. people will always do as they pleased. you close down wh people will go to high sec, you close down high sec people will go to low sec, you close down lowsec people will stop signing in . I think its one of those self preservation inbuild mechanism in the human race spceially since eve is real for some ! |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
87
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 14:19:00 -
[20] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Caliph Muhammed wrote:The answer to your convoluted question zim is how many of my ships and friends would I take along with me to do it. So let's see if I've got this right. Most people who are running plexes in nullsec (at between 50 and 75m/hour) are currently running them in PVE-fitted ships (which according to you isn't necessary). But to do the same job in a PVP-fitted ship, you'd have to bring more people, which splits the reward between two (or more) people, so we're down to less isk/hour than L4s. Which means we'd both be better off having a L4 char in empire for when we need to do some isk-making. Then we add your local changes (or rather just the removal thereof, since you never come up with anything other than "REMOVE LOCAL EVERYWHERE!!!!!!!!!"), and we have to add a char or a guy on each gate to watch for roaming gangs, which further degrades the isk/hour figure, making L4s even more attractive. Which brings me back to my assertation of a few days ago: just removing local will depopulate null and lowsec even further, and make the use of NPC corps or neutral alts even more prevalent in hisec during warsdecs. Which'll mean less people to shoot out in null and lowsec, and even less effective wardecs in hisec. Unless, of course, you're going to keep harping on about how "I'm wrong" and "the population would increase", in while totally ignoring all the empiric evidence which has been shown just the last year or so alone, f.ex through what happened in null after the anom buff (people moved out to nullsec), after the anom nerf (people moved back to hisec to do L4s), and also given what happened to incursions after the incursion nerf (incursions are apparently somewhat deserted now, compared to when they were choc full, just because the isk/hour went down).
Caliph is only interested in killing. Zim, he does not trully cares about numbers in eve. If he did we would realise that removing local will only encourage more people to do level 4s in high sec. He thinks tha if local get removed, all of a sudden he is gonna be in killing people by the millions XD. He does not understand that the soution is not to handycap eve back to 2003. He does not undestand that bait works better than nerfing back to the stone age. |
|

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
88
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 20:18:00 -
[21] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:Look at the replies. Pathetic. You guys got owned and you have no comebacks just more drivel. Why not just admit some of you are too idiotic to play without local?
i love how he goes bananas out of the blue. Why dont you admit you are too stupid to pvp, neverming you ever pvping in 0.0  |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
88
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 20:37:00 -
[22] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:I don't acutally know what the complaint about local is, so....
What if it didn't display a list of people in local? Or is that what people are asking for? Would make sense if you didn't show up in local if your cloaked though. I don't know, that just seems like a no brainer to me.
But I honestly don't know what's going on. I just saw balls and had to click the thread....
The guy cant pvp. He "pvp" in high sec. I said that in quotes cos i believe he said that what he actually does is gate camping. But puting that a side, he does not pvp in 0.0 and he comes in gets angry and insults everyone that has an opinion different from him and request local to b removed and on top of that he even says that SB bombs need to be nerfed just so that he could have no local.  |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
89
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 20:50:00 -
[23] - Quote
Blabb3r M0uth B11tch wrote:OK, I have a question directed directly at CCP. I admit it, I'm really, really stupid. So much so that I really have no interest in PVP what so ever. But I do like to mine and mission run. Not real big on being a clay pigeon for the Professional High Sec PVP pilots either. Stupid, but not that stupid. My question is this, since I'm stupid, (I have money, but stupid just the same) Should I just go play Sim City, and forget all about EvE?
shouldnt that be your decision instead of CCPs, after all its your time and money? |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
89
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 20:54:00 -
[24] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:i dont get why grow balls? the are weak and sensitive... if anything you should say grow a vagnina.... those things take a pounding... Betty white 2012... ROFL |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
89
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 22:18:00 -
[25] - Quote
Snow Burst wrote:Natsett Amuinn wrote:Blabb3r M0uth B11tch wrote:I'm of an opinion of this. HIgh Sec PVP isn't even about the PVP aspect of the game. My opinion is there are a few players out there that feel CCP is encroaching on there ability to absolutely ruin someones day. IE, it's not about PvP at all, but just making people miserable period, and your desperate desires to do so.
Believe it or not, there are actually very successful pirates that operate in 0.0 on a daily basis. I totally respect those guys and gals.
My personnel feelings is you high sec people, fighting for the right to be able to ruin peoples day in high sec, are nothing more than players that just can't make the grade. Nothing more, nothing less.
Like I said, the low sec, and 0.0 pirates, flourish and get my salute. Tank your high sec Hulks people. It's that simple.
PS Natsett Amuinn I would support removing local in 0.0. It would be more interesting for sure. Maybe even low sec. In high sec, NFW. A local that allows you to tell if it's friend or foe, gives you a false impression of the EVE universe. I don't want local to be removed. Do some people want it removed all together? I don't agree with that. They should remove the ability to extract informatin out of it. I don't use the list in my chat, except for intel chanell. Chat should open you up. Have a broadcast chanell that only reaches so far as well. your the standout from goonswarm then lol
lol thats exactly what i thought. I also pictured him with his ass facing in the wind
|

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
102
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 10:32:00 -
[26] - Quote
this thread and ideas suck 
have a cookie! |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
102
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 18:12:00 -
[27] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Nikk Narrel wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Yes, I'm well aware of the fact tons and tons of hisec miners are dying all over the place. I suspect, however, that you know what the proper fix to that particular problem is. I will guess that you would suggest some form of proactive defense. Considering the mackinaw's limits, that would most likely be having others escort you, all the way to setting bubblecamps on Null gates. I've no idea why you're talking about bubblecamps on null gates, I thought we were on the topic of hisec ganking of miners now?
i prefer talking about cookies. |
|
|
|